杜镀
DU Du

• 1:河南建筑职业技术学院工程管理系

摘要(Abstract)：

为了研究爆破漏斗的变化规律，通过小比例模型试验及数值模拟方法对长径比为3、5、7、9、11的柱状药包在不同填塞长度下的爆破漏斗进行试验。结果表明：在装药量不变情况下，随着填塞增加，漏斗体积增加46%～253%,单耗降低30%～73%;在填塞不变时，随着装药量增加，漏斗体积增加14%～96%,单耗增加13%～77%。飞散物抛掷速度与装药量呈正比、与最小抵抗线成反比，其速度达到峰值后小幅度降低并产生二次加速，并且第2次峰值速度小于第1次，随后进行自由落体运动。通过数值模拟证明了SPH法与RHT本构在处理岩体爆破等大变形问题中的准确性，并验证了试验结果准确性。
In order to study the changing law of the blasting crater, the blast crater tests with cylinder charge aspect ratios of 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 and different stemming lengths were carried out by the small scale model test and numerical simulation. The results show that when the charge quality remains unchanged, the blast crater volume increases by 46% to 253% and the unit explosive consumption decreases by 30% to 73%, and when the stemming remains unchanged, the blasting crater volume increases by 14% to 96%, and the unit explosive consumption increases by 13% to 77% with the increase of the charge. The velocity of the flying object is proportional to the charge and inversely proportional to the minimum resistance line. After reaching the peak value, the velocity decreases slightly, accelerates for a second time then, and finally goes into free fall. The second peak value is smaller than the first one. The accuracy of the SPH method and the RHT constitutive method in dealing with large deformation problems such as rock blasting is proved by numerical simulation, and the accuracy of test results is verified.

关键词(KeyWords)： 柱状药包;爆破漏斗;模型试验;数值模拟;长径比;填塞高度
cylindrical charge;blast crater;model test;numerical simulation;aspect ratio;stemming height

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 河南省教育厅基金资助项目(2023-ZDJH-210)

作者(Author): 杜镀
DU Du

DOI: 10.19931/j.EB.20210055

参考文献(References)：

• [1] 郭洋，李清，杨仁树，等.三维模型柱状药包爆生裂纹扩展规律研究[J].振动与冲击，2020,39(10):133-140,184.GUO Y,LI Q,YANG R S,et al.Study on crack propagation law of cylindrical charges in three-dimensional models[J].Journal of Vibration and Shock,2020,39(10):133-140,184.
• [2] 张函，张君华，戴丽萍.柱状药包在岩石介质中爆破破裂区域的理论分析及数值模拟[J].煤炭技术，2018,37(12):26-28.ZHANG H,ZHANG J H,DAI L P.Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation of blasting fracture zone of cylindrical charge in rock medium[J].Coal Technology,2018,37(12):26-28.
• [3] 陈传进.半无限岩体中柱状药包爆破扩裂数值模拟研究[D].廊坊：华北科技学院，2018.CHEN C J.Numercial simulation of blasting cracking for semi infinite rock mass with cylindrical charge[D].Langfang:North China Institute of Science and Technology,2018.
• [4] 曾庆田，胡正祥，刘科伟.高地应力条件下爆破漏斗实验及数值模拟研究[J].金属矿山，2021(2):36-40.ZENG Q T,HU Z X,LIU K W.Experiment and numerical simulation of blasting crater under high in-situ stress[J].Metal Mine,2021(2):36-40.
• [5] 李二宝，杨恒，杨海涛，等.爆破漏斗成形规律数值模拟及试验研究[J].现代矿业，2020,36(4):59-63.LI E B,YANG H,YANG H T,et al.Numerical simulation and test study on forming law of blasting crater[J].Modern Mining,2020,36(4):59-63.
• [6] 江晓松.某金属矿山爆破漏斗试验研究与应用[J].世界有色金属，2020(6):253-254.JIANG X S.Directional blasting demolition of a brick chimney[J].World Nonferrous Metals,2020(6):253-254.
• [7] 邱胜光，孙明武.基于爆破漏斗试验的大直径深孔爆破参数研究[J].矿业研究与开发，2020,40(1):64-69.QIU S G,SUN M W.Study on the parameters of large-diameter deep-hole blasting based on the blasting crater test[J].Mining Research and Development,2020,40(1):64-69.
• [8] 吴再海，安龙，齐兆军，等.基于LS-DYNA与PFC联合的岩体爆破数值模拟方法分析[J].采矿与安全工程学报，2021,38(3):609-614WU Z H,AN L,QI Z J,et al.The numerical simulation method of rock mass blasting based on PFC combined with LS-DYNA[J].Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering,2021,38(3):609-614.
• [9] 张智宇，陈春超，黄永辉，等.爆破漏斗鼓包运动模型的构建及验证[J].北京理工大学学报，2020,40(8):810-817.ZHANG Z Y,CHEN C C,HUANG Y H,et al.Construction and validation for the model of bulging movement in explosion [J].Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology,2020,40(8):810-817.
• [10] 吴霄，李祥龙，张松涛，等.孔排距对高台阶抛掷爆破效果影响的模型试验[J].地下空间与工程学报，2019,15(6):1 889-1 894,1 902.WU X,LI XL,ZHANG ST,et al.Model experiment study on the effect of casting parameters on the cast percentage of high bench cast blasting[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2019,15(6):1 889-1 894,1 902.
• [11] 张智宇，丁飞，李洪超，等.最小抵抗线对台阶模型爆破效果影响研究[J].北京理工大学学报，2020,40(2):129-134.ZHANG Z Y,DING F,LI H C,et al.Study on the effect of minimum resistance line on blasting effect of bench model[J].Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology,2020,40(2):129-134.
• [12] 王怀，黎谟炬，林大能，等.基于Ansys-autodyn的水下爆破抛掷距离研究[J].采矿技术，2020,20(6):194-198.WANG H,LI M J,LIN D N,et al.Research on underwater blasting throw distance based on ANSYS - AUTODYN[J].Mining Technology,2020,20(6):194-198.
• [13] 胡涛.高台阶抛掷爆破相似模型试验研究[D].昆明：昆明理工大学，2016.HU T.Experimental study on similar model of high step throw blasting[D].Kunming :Kunming University of Science and Technology,2016.
• [14] 刘谋斌，宗智，常建忠.光滑粒子动力学方法的发展与应用[J].力学进展，2011,41(2):217-234.LIU M B,ZONG Z,CHANG J Z.Developments and applications of smoothed particle hydrodynamics[J].Advances in Mechanics,2011,41(2):217-234.
• [15] 胡嫚，谢谟文，王立伟.基于弹塑性土体本构模型的滑坡运动过程SPH模拟[J].岩土工程学报，2016,38(1):58-67.HU M,XIE M W,WANG L W.SPH simulations of post-failure flow of landslides using elastic-plastic soil constitutive model[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2016,38(1):58-67.
• [16] 陈薇，朱晓临.解决SPH方法应力不稳定问题的改进方法[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2019,42(11):1 576-1 584.CHEN W,ZHU X L.An improved method for dealing with stress instability in SPH method[J].Journal of Hefei University of Technology(Natural science edition),2019,42(11):1 576-1 584.
• [17] 雷涛，许浩明，蒋复量，等.爆破漏斗形成过程的SPH-FEM数值模拟[J].金属矿山，2018(5):17-22.LEI T,XU H M,JIANG F L,et al.Numerical simulation of blasting crater formation based on SPH-FEM coupling method[J].Metal Mine,2018(5):17-22.
• [18] 缪广红，李亮，江向阳，等.爆炸复合边界效应SPH方法的数值模拟(英文)[J].含能材料，2017,25(9):762-766.MIAO G H,LI L,JIANG X Y,et al.Numerical simulation on boundary effect in explosive cladding by smoothed particle hydrodynamics[J].Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials,2017,25(9):762-766.
• [19] 凌天龙，王宇涛，刘殿书，等.修正RHT模型在岩体爆破响应数值模拟中的应用[J].煤炭学报，2018,43(S2):434-442.LING T L,WANG Y T,LIU D S,et al.Modified RHT model for numerical simulation of dynamic response of rock mass under blasting load[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2018,43(S2):434-442.
• [20] 周晓青，洪家柱.爆炸荷载作用下钢筋混凝土墙的动态响应模拟[J].防灾减灾工程学报，2016,36(1):153-158.ZHOU X Q,HONG J Z.Numerical simulation of dynamic responses of RC walls under blast loading[J].Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering,2016,36(1):153-158.
• [21] 李洪超.岩石RHT模型理论及主要参数确定方法研究[D].北京：中国矿业大学(北京),2016.LI H C.The study of the rock RHT model and to determine the values of main parameters[D].Beijing:China University of Mining & Technology,Beijing,2016.
• [22] 刘殿柱，刘娜，高天赐，等.应用正交试验法的RHT模型参数敏感性研究[J].北京理工大学学报，2019,39(6):558-564.LIU D Z,LIU N,GAO T C,et al.Study on the parameter sensitivity of RHT concrete model by orthogonal test technique[J].Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology,2019,39(6):558-564.