刘建民;陈文涛;
LIU Jian-min,CHEN Wen-tao (Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi'an 710072,China)

• 1:西北工业大学力学与土木建筑学院
• 2:西北工业大学力学与土木建筑学院 西安710072
• 3:西安710072

摘要(Abstract)：

埋地管道设计规范通常仅考虑管内介质的性质、埋设方式和深度、地质条件和环境气候条件,而未考虑爆炸荷载的影响作用。本文利用有限元软件ANSYNS/LS-DYNA对炸药地面爆炸或侵入土中浅层爆炸两种情形下埋地管道的动力响应问题作了三维模拟,对比分析了炸药设置方式、炸药用量、爆心距和管道管径等因素对埋地管道损伤的不同作用。结果表明:相近条件下,炸药侵入土中浅层爆炸比地面爆炸对埋地管道可能产生的实质性损伤更大;在炸药地面爆炸荷载下,爆心距的影响作用比炸药用量更为突出,而管径的影响作用几乎可以忽略;在炸药侵入土中浅层爆炸荷载下,炸药用量的影响作用与爆心距变得较为接近,管径的影响作用则略有增加。
The nature of medium in pipeline,the buried way and buried depth,the geological and environmental condition are always paid much attention in design codes of buried pipeline,with the influence of blast loads being ignored.In this paper,dynamic response of buried pipeline under blast loads invading in shallow soil and surface explosive's 3-D model was stimulated by ANSYNS/LS-DYNA FEM,a software of numerical simulation calculation.Explosive setting,distance to explosive's center,explosive charge and pipe diameter were comparatively studied.The results showed that in similar condition,explosive invading in soil was more likely to caused damage to buried pipeline than surface explosion.Under surface explosion,the influence of distance to explosive's center to dynamic response of buried pipeline took predominance over the explosive charge,and the influence of pipe diameter could be practically negligible.Under explosive invading in soil,influence of explosive charge to dynamic response of buried pipeline became relatively close to the distance to explosive's center,with the influence of pipe diameter being slightly increased.

关键词(KeyWords)： 埋地管道;动力响应;炸药设置;爆心距;炸药用量;管径
Buried pipeline;Dynamic response;Explosive setting;Distance to explosive's center;Explosive charge;Pipe diameter

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Authors): 刘建民;陈文涛;
LIU Jian-min,CHEN Wen-tao (Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi'an 710072,China)

参考文献(References)：

• [1]黄清猷.地下管道计算[M].武汉:湖北科学技术出版社,1991.
• [2]顾安全.上埋式管道及洞室垂直土压力研究[J].岩土工程学报,1981,l3(1):1-15.
• [3]范俊余.炸药地面爆炸条件下土中浅埋结构上荷载的数值分析[C].中国力学学会会议论文集,2005.
• [4]Kouretzis G P,et al.Analytical calculation of blast-in-duced strains to buried pipelines[J].International jour-nal of I mpact Engineering(2006),doi:10.1016/j.iji m-peng.2006.08.008.
• [5]Siskind D E,Stagg MS,Wiegand J E,Schulz D L.Sur-face mine blasting near pressurized transmission pipelines[R].Report of Investigations RI9523,to US Depart-ment of Interior,Bureau of Mines,1994.
• 〔6]都的箭,马书广,杨惊东.埋地管道爆炸地冲击作用的试验研究[J].工程爆破,2006,2(2):19-23.
• [7]王飞,王连来,刘广初.爆炸荷载对天然气管道(空管)的破坏作用研究[J].爆破,2006,23(4):20-24.
• [8]都的箭,邓正栋,张平,等.土中爆炸地冲击作用下埋地管线的数值模拟[J].爆破,2005,22(1):20-24.
• [9]LS-DYNA_970_MANUAL[M].LIVERMORE SOFT-WARE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,2007.
• [10]刘晶波.地下箱形结构在爆炸冲击荷载作用下的动力响应分析[J].解放军理工大学学报,2007,5(8):520-524.
• [11]王万鹏.混凝土加固钢壳结构内爆响应的数值模拟研究[D].西安:西北工业大学硕士论文,2005.
• [12]时党勇,李裕春,张胜民,等.基于ANSYS/LS-DYNA8.1进行显示动力分析[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2004.